In a recent Chronicle of Higher Education virtual panel discussion, Scott Carlson hosted a thought-provoking session titled “Designing a Campus for Student Engagement.” I found myself deeply resonating with the conversation, not just because of the incredible insight from leaders like Shari Bax (University of Central Missouri), Lauren Koppel (MSU Denver), and Cooper Melton (Ayers Saint Gross), but because it reaffirmed what we’ve been advocating at Porter Khouw Consulting for decades: the physical and social architecture of a campus must intentionally foster connection—not just convenience.
The panelists confirmed what we already know but must keep repeating: the pandemic didn’t just disrupt learning—it disrupted belonging. The student experience, once defined by informal face-to-face interactions, communal living, and chance encounters, has shifted. In its place, we’ve seen a transactional, tech-driven, and often isolating reality emerge for today’s students.
But what comes next? And how can we design campuses—both physically and programmatically—to pull students back from the edge of disengagement and loneliness?
Let me share my takeaways and build upon them with the SOCIAL ARCHITECTURE™ lens that’s driven our work across more than 400 campuses in North America.
- The Isolation Generation Is Real—and They’re Not Coming Back the Same
Shari Bax shared how first-year students entered the University of Central Missouri post-pandemic more isolated than ever. Many had spent their senior year in high school alone, only to arrive on campus to live in single dorm rooms, masked and distanced, in a world that barely resembled the “college experience” they had imagined.
She wisely noted that this is not a temporary blip—it’s a generational shift. Today’s students have been shaped by trauma, by isolation, and by technology that offers the illusion of connection without its substance. I’ve long said that loneliness is the silent epidemic on college campuses—and COVID merely unmasked it.
This isn’t a gap that can be bridged with another app or platform. It requires the kind of intentional, human-first design we call SOCIAL ARCHITECTURE™: programming and spaces that aren’t just functional, but deeply relational.
- Commuter Students Need Social Infrastructure More Than Ever
Lauren Koppel of MSU Denver made a critical point that cannot be overstated: many students, especially those from lower-income backgrounds, are making rational decisions not to engage.
Think about it—when a student has to take two buses and spend $8 on parking for a one-hour event, the ROI must be clear and compelling. What am I getting out of this? How does this serve my academic or professional journey?
This is not apathy. It’s discernment. And it means institutions must earn students’ time and presence.
The solution is twofold:
- Make the value proposition of engagement undeniable.
- Bring the community to them—through tailored, purpose-driven programming embedded in their daily rhythms, and through smart campus planning that reduces barriers to entry (physically and psychologically).
- Design Spaces That Remove the Option to Opt Out
Cooper Melton’s architectural perspective struck a chord. He described how outdated campus buildings often “sap the energy out” of community simply by allowing students to bypass each other entirely—six entrances to a dorm, corridors that funnel students straight to their rooms, gathering spaces hidden in back corners.
This is where design must become strategic empathy.
At PKC, we’ve long advocated for the reimagining of dining halls, student unions, and residence halls not just as facilities—but as social engines. The goal is not to force interaction, but to remove friction. Or as Cooper put it, to reduce the opportunities for students to avoid each other.
The best campus designs we’ve developed feature clear arrival sequences, central communal zones, inviting furniture arrangements, varied sensory zones for neurodiverse comfort, and unprogrammed open space that still subtly “nudges” interaction.
- The Most Powerful Day-to-Day and First-Year Strategy: Dining Designed for SOCIAL ARCHITECTURE™
Here’s what we’ve found over 30+ years of work on campuses nationwide:
Dining—when designed through the lens of SOCIAL ARCHITECTURE™—is the single most powerful tool on a day-to-day basis for driving student engagement, connection, and emotional well-being.
But even more significantly, it is the single most effective first-year strategy for helping students:
- Establish and nurture new friendship networks
- Experience meaningful face-to-face interaction
- Build emotional security and a sense of belonging
- And ultimately persist through their college journey
This isn’t about transactional dining halls serving reheated meals under harsh lighting.
We’re talking about Next Generation Residential and Retail Anytime Dining, where extended hours, flexible seating, culinary variety, and dynamic programming come together to foster authentic, repeated, unforced social contact.
When done properly, we’ve seen measurable results:
- Retention increases as students find community
- Housing occupancy rises as students choose to stay
- Enrollment improves as persistence grows
- And most importantly, students’ emotional well-being strengthens, driven by the simple but powerful increase in human connection
Dining—when treated as the social infrastructure it truly is—can shift the entire student experience.
- Start With First-Year Students, and Start Before They Arrive
Both Shari and Lauren emphasized pre-enrollment programming and structured welcome weeks. That’s a great start—but it must go deeper.
At PKC, we’re guided by a powerful data point: the first six weeks of the freshman year are the most critical period in shaping long-term retention, housing occupancy, and emotional wellbeing.
We recommend institutions not just offer early move-in and orientation—but build a multi-week social integration strategy. One that blends:
- First-year exclusive events in key campus spaces
- Peer mentor dining programs
- Involvement fairs integrated into meal hours
- Faculty dinners in residence halls
- And creative micro-events that consistently expose students to each other, not just the campus
- Inclusion Means More Than Messaging—It’s Environmental
The conversation also highlighted the growing awareness of neurodiversity and the need for inclusive spaces. Design matters. Lighting, acoustics, layout, even restroom privacy—all play a role in signaling who “belongs” in a space.
SOCIAL ARCHITECTURE™ is inherently inclusive when done right. It creates opportunities for all students to find their comfort zone and a path to growth, engagement, and human connection.
Final Thought: What’s the ROI of Belonging?
If you take one idea from this panel and from this blog, let it be this:
Belonging isn’t just a feeling—it’s a strategic imperative.
Students who feel seen, supported, and socially embedded stay enrolled. They thrive academically. They persist. And they become alumni who look back on college not just as a degree, but as a life-defining chapter.
In this era of declining enrollment and deep disconnection, the solution won’t come from gadgets or gimmicks.
It will come from human-centered design, from programming that sparks relationships, and from a commitment to turning every square foot of campus into an opportunity to connect.
That’s SOCIAL ARCHITECTURE™.
That’s our mission.
And that’s the future of higher education.
Interested in how your campus can foster stronger engagement, build social capital, and improve student retention?Let’s talk about your dining strategy—and how we can help you turn it into a social engine.